设为首页
加入收藏
联系我们
Email-Alert
 

    首页 | 杂志介绍 | 编委成员 | 审稿专家名录 | 投稿指南 | 订阅指南 | 过刊浏览 | 论著模板 | 综述模板 | 帮助

 
高 焱,燕铁斌,尤黎明,李 琨,张莉芳.《国际功能、残疾和健康分类·康复组合》在非急性期患者中使用的信度与效度分析[J].中国康复医学杂志,2019,(10):1193~1198
《国际功能、残疾和健康分类·康复组合》在非急性期患者中使用的信度与效度分析    点此下载全文
高 焱  燕铁斌  尤黎明  李 琨  张莉芳
中山大学护理学院, 广州, 510080
基金项目:广州市科技局产学研协同创新重大专项(201704020140);美国中华医学基金会项目(04-808)
DOI:
摘要点击次数: 145
全文下载次数: 86
摘要:
      摘要 目的:检验《国际功能、残疾和健康分类?康复组合》(the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Rehabilitation Set)在非急性期患者中使用的信度与效度。 方法:广东、福建、湖北省13个研究中心有515例非急性期患者参与研究,采用ICF康复组合、Barthel指数 (Barthel Index)、SF-36(Short Form-36)进行评定。分析ICF康复组合的内在一致性、评定者间信度、评定者内信度和效标关联效度。 结果:ICF康复组合的身体功能、活动和参与成分的Cronbach α系数分别是0.69和0.87;评定者间一致率和加权Kappa系数均值为68.5%和0.73;评定者内信度结果显示一致率和加权Kappa系数均值分别是81.7%和0.82;身体功能、活动、参与三个成分与Barthel指数呈中度至高度负相关(r=-0.498—-0.887,P<0.01),与SF-36中生理功能成分的相关性尚可(r=-0.524—-0.900,P<0.01),与躯体疼痛成分没有相关性或相关性较差,与SF-36的生理职能、总体健康、活力、社会功能、情感职能和精神健康成分呈现中到低度的相关性(r=-0.254—-0.547,P<0.01)。 结论:ICF康复组合具有较好的信度与效度,适合作为评定工具在临床实践中使用。
关键词:国际功能、残疾和健康分类  康复组合  信度  效度
Reliability and validity of International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Rehabilitation Set in post-acute rehabilitation patients    Download Fulltext
School of Nursing, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080
Fund Project:
Abstract:
      Abstract Objective: To investigate the reliability and validity of International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Rehabilitation Set (ICF-RS) in post-acute rehabilitation patients. Method: 515 post-acute rehabilitation patients were recruited in 13 research centers in Guangdong, Fujian and Hubei provinces and they were assessed using the ICF-RS, the Barthel Index (BI), and the Mos 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). The tested psychometric properties of the ICF-RS included internal consistency, interrater reliability, intra-rater reliability and criterion-related validity. Result: The Cronbach' α coefficient of the Body Functions (BF), Activities and Participation (AP) components of the ICF-RS were 0.69 and 0.87 respectively. The weighted Kappa for the interrater and the intrarater agreement were 0.73 and 0.82, indicating good reliability. The criterion-related validity of the ICF-RS was examined based on the results of Rasch analysis which was divided into BF, A and P three components to fit the model expectation. The total scores of BF, A and P components showed moderate to high negative correlations with the BI (r=-0.498—-0.887,P<0.01), moderate to high negative correlations with the SF-36 physical functioning (PF) domain (r=-0.524—-0.900,P<0.01), low to no correlations with the bodily pain (BP) domain, and moderate to low correlations with the role-physical (RP), general health (GH), vitality, social functioning (SF), role emotional (RE) , and mental health (HT) domains (r=-0.254—-0.547,P<0.01). Conclusion: The ICF-RS showed good reliability and validity and can be applied as a functioning assessment instrument in clinical practice.
Keywords:International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health  rehabilitation set  reliability  validity
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器

您是本站第 23131088 位访问者

版权所有:中国康复医学会
主管单位:国家卫生健康委员会 主办单位:中国康复医学会
地址:北京市朝阳区樱花园东街,中日友好医院内   邮政编码:100029   电话:010-64218095   

本系统由北京勤云科技发展有限公司设计 京ICP备18060696号-2